A landing page for a new feature
Give Claude the feature details and a page to use as a reference. It can prepare the copy and layout using your site's existing components.
Claude-first website migration
I move your marketing website into a setup where Claude can prepare new pages, update articles and change copy across the site. You review the changes before they go live.
The problem
You launch a feature and need a page for it. Your positioning changes, but the old message is scattered across the site. A useful article needs an update, and nobody wants to work through the editor again.
I set up the site so Claude can work with its code, content and design instructions together. You describe the change, inspect a preview and decide what to publish.
What Claude can prepare
Give Claude the feature details and a page to use as a reference. It can prepare the copy and layout using your site's existing components.
Provide new sources and explain what needs changing. Claude can revise the article, suggest relevant internal links and prepare it for review.
Give Claude the approved wording. It can find old references across pages, metadata and FAQs, then propose the edits together.
Claude can prepare translated pages using your existing structure. Someone fluent in the language still needs to check the wording and meaning.
Claude can inspect the site, suggest links between related pages and draft titles and descriptions. You review relevance and accuracy before publishing.
The site's code and content live in Git, with a record of changes. I assess what can move and identify anything that needs separate handling before starting.
I document your page structure, reusable components and writing rules. Claude gets a reference for how to make changes without redesigning the site every time.
I set up a way to review changes before they reach the public site, with checks and a way to return to an earlier version.
We agree which pages and functions must carry over. I check the relevant URLs, redirects, metadata, forms, analytics and mobile layouts before launch.
I show you how to request a change, inspect what Claude did and publish an approved version. We use a real change to your site during the handover.
Claude can misunderstand a request, invent a detail or break something. You still need to check facts, wording, design and functionality.
The setup gives you a way to make and review changes. It does not remove responsibility for what you publish.
Discuss my websiteQuestions before you migrate
I review your current setup first. Some sites need a migration; others already have much of what is needed. The scope depends on how your content, code and integrations work today.
Keeping your current design is the starting point. I flag anything that cannot transfer directly before we agree the work.
There is no guaranteed increase. A migration can also hurt search performance if it is handled badly. The work includes checking the agreed search-related essentials, such as existing URLs, redirects and metadata. Content quality and other factors still matter.
For some changes, yes. Claude can help with routine page and content work, but complex integrations, security and application logic may still need a developer.
I recommend a setup after reviewing your site. The choice depends on your content, integrations, editing needs and existing infrastructure.
That depends on the size of the site and what needs to keep working. We agree the scope, price and timing before the migration starts.
We can discuss whether a Claude-first setup fits, what needs to move and what should stay as it is.
Discuss my website